|
Moving
Churches St
Peter's Saltfleetby and its changing place in the life of the village -
Reflections on the Sacred Place
Seen
from the outside, St. Peter's Church at Saltfleetby appears to be a
Victorian building, typical of the work of local architect, James
Fowler, former diocesan architect and three times Mayor of Louth.
Inside, the building is not so simple.
The
arches and pillars are much earlier than the Victorian era, and the face
on the pillar in the north west corner is definitely mediaeval, though
the three in the other corners of the church look much newer.
The
answer to this architectural puzzle can be found in a group of
photographs on the west wall. One shows a building, very like the
present one, but with a clerestory and in a very sad state of repair.
Another shows a tower, looking like a church tower, but standing on its
own in a graveyard. The two pictures tell the story of St. Peter's
Church building. One hundred and forty years ago, the village church was
an isolated one, in a sad state of repair. A new building would be too
expensive, so the old one, minus the tower and the clerestory, was
dismantled and rebuilt on its present site.
Saltfleetby
St Peter's is a linear village. All the present day amenities - shop,
church, pub, school, village hall - and most of the housing are along
the sides of the B1200, a straight road that connects Louth with the
coast. Little has changed since the church was moved. There are more
houses and fewer pubs, but the shape of the village has hardly changed,
except for the position of the church.
So,
after 1877, St Peter's has an Anglican Church that is slightly more
accessible and a lot safer than the old one. It seems that moving the
old church of St. Peter's was a more viable proposition than building a
new one - the expense being the main argument.
The new site was found, nearer to the village, by exchanging some of the
glebe land, and by a gift of more land. The legal work and the
fund-raising began. A faculty had to be granted, and any comments of the
parishioners had to be heard. For the fund raising the church seems to
have relied largely on gifts, but a letter from the Archdeacon
describing the state of the church was circulated, along with a
photograph, and this seems to have added to the urgency of the
giving.
So
in 1876, on the second Sunday after Easter, the last celebration of Holy
Communion took place in the old church. Three weeks later the Bishop
laid the foundation stone of the new church, and just over a year later
the new church was consecrated. The original plans had to be altered, in
that they had included the tower and the clerestory, but the timbers of
the old roof were in such a sorry state that they could not be re-used.
The tower was left on condition that it became the cemetery chapel,
though now it is not used at all.
The
"new" church is almost identical to the old. The nave, aisles,
porch and vestry are all exactly the same size, but the chancel is three
feet longer. The arches and pillars had become distorted by the
subsidence of the old building and were restored to their former
shape.
When
the work had been completed the balance sheet was audited and the
Rector, Revd. W. Watson wrote "...no debt remains on the building.
The total expenditure, without including £1755 value of old materials
and including the cost of a new bridge is £1,780." (A large drain,
known as the Mardyke, runs along the side of the B1200 and all buildings
on that side of the road have to have a bridge for access.)
The
"new" church is closer to the houses in the village, both as
it was then and as it is now, but the new site has brought problems of a
different nature.
The
"new" church was built on clay, and owing to changes in the
way that the land has been drained, the height of the water table has
changed and a few years ago the building had to be closed for major
repairs. The Revd. Watson and his contemporaries could not have foreseen
this. Subsidence still remains a problem and any cracks appearing in the
plaster have to be carefully monitored.
The
effort of the Rev. Watson and his colleagues may seem rather strange to
us now. After all, there were two other Anglican churches very close by
and three Methodist chapels. But the other two churches were in
different parishes and although population in those parishes was low the
idea of amalgamating does not seem to have occurred to anyone. As for
working with the Methodists, there were times when they were not even
speaking to one another, let alone praying together. Happily things are
different now.
St.
Clements and All Saints churches are both redundant - St. Clements as a
restaurant and All Saints in the care of the Churches Conservation
Trust. Of the three Methodist chapels, one has been demolished, one is a
private house and the third is a snooker hall. St. Peter's is now the
only place of worship in the village and is a Local Ecumenical
Partnership between the Anglicans and the Methodists, with shared
worship taking place every Sunday.
All
local weddings, baptisms and funerals take place there, the service
being conducted either by the Methodist minister or the Anglican priest.
The Church is still an important part of life in Saltfleetby. The pews
have been removed and Harvest Suppers take place there. The building and
grounds are used for fund raising - a plant sale took place recently,
and a garden party is planned. These events are well supported by people
from the village, whether or not they are members of the church.
Recently alterations were made inside the church so that a kitchen and
toilet could be installed, and Saltfleetby Millennium Committee are
paying for new storm doors to be fitted to the porch.
So
St. Peter's still has an important place in the life of the village, as
a place for social events to take place and as a place to celebrate the
important events in people's lives. The children of the village visit
regularly too. Saltfleetby Primary School is a church school and every
year harvest and Christingle services are held there. The church is also
an important resource for the new R.E. syllabus.
When
I asked the children why the Church should be thought of as a special
place they recognised its importance to mark special events in people's
lives, particularly baptisms and weddings. They also suggested that it
is a peaceful place.
But
being special and being sacred are not necessarily the same thing,
though for many people the two are interchangeable. Sacred I think means
being aware of one's closeness to God. For many people this means that a
hilltop, beach, or by the side of a river is a sacred place. This is for
individuals. When a place becomes sacred to a group then it might become
a place of pilgrimage or shrine. It then becomes sacred to a community,
perhaps a religious community, or perhaps a village community. It is
then that structures start to appear. First a cross, signifying that
this is where itinerant preachers will preach, then maybe a small
building, which grows in size and ornateness as it receives donations
from pilgrims. Eventually it can become the size and have the splendour
of a Cathedral. But not all sacred sites develop in this way. There are
still standing crosses in places, and many English towns have crosses at
their centre. And there are small chapels and shrines, often, though not
always beside holy wells or springs.
And
sometimes the chapel or shrine becomes the centre of a small village and
in time becomes the village church. St. Chad's at Stowe near Lichfield
is an example of this: a holy well became the site for pilgrimage and is
now a thriving church involved in local and international ministry.
David
Bellamy in his book "Sacred Britain" writes:
"Each
and every one of us knows what the sacred means to us, that tingle of
something special, an aura of peace and tranquillity, a sense of being
safe. The Welsh have a word for it - cynefin - which means the place
where I am at ease, the place where I want to be."
He goes on to say:
"Then there are all those sacred places which you can share or have
shared with others: Glastonbury Tor, the great stone henges, a city
cathedral, your local parish church or chapel. Our parish church was
built in the fourteenth century and so for over five hundred years has
not only been a place of worship, but a sanctuary where local people
have shared their griefs and woes and celebrated the sanctities of life
- birth, marriage, death and rebirth."
St. Peter's was at one time a fine mediaeval building, but because of
subsidence it fell into disrepair; but because it held so many memories
of local and personal events it could not be completely abandoned. Apart
from financial considerations the people wanted to hold on to their
past. Their roots went deep and one of the things holding those roots in
place was the local church. Continuity matters to people; it mattered to
the people of Saltfleetby one hundred and thirty years ago.
The continuity of prayer in one place throughout many years seems to
endow sacredness on a place. Even the redundant churches in my parish
are still sacred and people will attend the rare special occasion
services that we hold there who would not think of attending other
churches. In spite of the size of the buildings, the impossibility of
heating or maintaining them, there are still those who think that we
have let God down by ending our financial struggles with the buildings
so that we can use more of our energy in being the people of God, not
caretakers of huge buildings.
St. Peter's church is a special place for many people, people who would
not use the word sacred in their every day conversation. People who have
grown up in the village want to return for their weddings, and those who
have moved into Louth (all of ten miles) often want to return to have
their children baptised. Partly this is because of family connections,
and partly because St. Peter's is "their" church. It matters
to them that the special events in their lives take place in a church
that belongs not just to them, but also to their families, to their
village.
St. Peter's is a sacred place because of its history, but there is more
to it than that. Part of what makes it sacred is the nature of the
events that take place there too, and part of it is that it is the place
where many make their connection with God, and where they feel that that
link is at its strongest.
Bridget Hill
|