|
POST
ROMAN
Lindsey's
Anglo-Saxon shoreline at the dawn of the "Dark Ages" must have had an
air of desolation and decay. However the offshore sandbanks and tidal estuaries
had a similarity to those of north-west Europe from which the land-hungry
Anglo-Saxons began to arrive and colonise after the Romans had left our shores.
An
examination of an OS map for the area, along with the Domesday Book, will
provide us with some idea of the pattern of settlement along our coast. The
first line of settlement was along the 10m (30') contour. Cockerington,
Alvingham, Yarburgh, Fulstow and Tetney are a few of these to the north. To the
south we have Mablethorpe and Sutton-le Marsh. We must assume that the land to
the east of Alvingham/Tetney was at first unsuitable for settlement. There being
no villages with Anglo-Saxon suffixes - ham, -ton, -ingham, -ington etc. to the
east of that line. The coastline was much further inland here than today. South
of Mablethorpe it was further east. Mablethorpe appears to be the fulcrum of
this land movement.
Today
Mablethorpe is still the fulcrum but there has been a switch. The sea to the
north has retreated eastwards while to the south it has come inland only kept at
bay by the sea defences.
However
there is a major problem with settlement in the south of Lindsey. If we examine
the settlements between the Wolds and the sea we find the majority have
Danish/Viking suffixes to their names. Most common is the "-by"
suffix. Why then, should Mablethorpe and Sutton well to the east be Anglo-Saxon
and all settlements to the west are Danish? Was the land here slightly higher
than that to the west? Or were these villages' secondary settlements much as
Somercotes was to Cockerington further north.
Mablethorpe
may well have been the daughter settlement to Strubby and Sutton to Maltby. The
only problem with this theory is the Roman finds at Mablethorpe and the
Anglo-Saxon -ton suffix to Sutton.
It
is felt that both towns are daughter settlements. The -thorpe suffix can be
Danish in origin, meaning secondary settlement. Sutton with its -ton suffix
presents another problem. The Oxford Dictionary of Place Names states that
Sutton means "south town". Could the Danes have named Sutton as the
town south of their settlement of Mablethorpe? It is a possibility.
As
the first line of settlements along the 10m contour were established so the
following Anglo-Saxons had to move inland, clearing the woodland and creating
their villages. A study of an OS map along with the knowledge of Anglo-Saxon
suffixes will show just how extensive was this settlement.
The
late 8th and early 9th centuries not only ushered in a wetter period but also
saw fierce seasonal raids by the Danes. This was followed by an organised army.
Having established the "Danelaw", the retired soldiers brought their
families over to settle in the newly established villages and thus became
another wave of colonists. The distribution of their villages, many with the -by
ending or the -thorpe meaning daughter settlement, shows how they occupied the
marsh pastures or filled in the gaps left by the Anglo-Saxons.
By
this time, some 350 years after the Anglo-Saxons had settled, the land to the
south must have become drier and thus provided excellent village sites. We also
see the establishment of daughter settlements to the north. Somercotes has
already been mentioned as being the extension or summer grazing pasture for
Cockerington. Other examples are North Cotes as an extension of North Thoresby.
Grainthorpe to Covenham and later Marsh Chapel to Fulstow. There are other
examples to be found.
The
suffix -cotes simply means cots or huts and Somer- means summer. Therefore the
name simply means the summer huts of the village of Cockerington. It was to this
marshland that the villagers of Cockerington took their cattle to graze in the
lush pastures during the summer months. Similarly the people of Thoresby took
their cattle to graze on the marsh to the northeast of their settlement, hence
North Cotes.
At
this time the onshore winds began to form low dunes which the farmers eventually
enlarged to form a sea dyke (wall or sea defence) They were also helped by the
erosion of the Holderness coast and the action of the sea in its longshore
drift. They were able to established these huts as villages in their own right.
The
farmers also began salt making during the summer months. Salt, just as in the
Roman times, was needed to keep meat fresh through the long winter months. Their
saltern mounds can be seen to this day along the North Cotes to Grainthorpe
stretch of land east of Sea Dyke Lane (A1031) to the sea. In Humberstone the
salt marsh is known as "Fitties" which is Danish for Salt Marsh.
The
next major change occurred on the 13th century when in 1253 an abnormal high
tide flowed inland as far as Alvingham. There had been flood earlier and we can
assume this to be a stormy period. The second, and more disastrous series of
floods occurred on the night of New Year's Day 1287 when the church of St Peter,
Mablethorpe, was:" rent asunder by the waves of the sea".
The
surges of 1287 and 1288 finally destroyed the offshore barrier shoals. Sand and
shingle from these overfalls was driven to the shore to form dunes up to 50' in
height from Somercotes narrowing towards Mablethorpe, with a smaller one from
Cleethorpes to Humberstone. The coastline was now open to the full force of the
North Sea and man has had a constant battle to keep the waves at bay.
The
16th century saw another series of storms. Many of the old coastal towns were
finally lost to the sea. The greatest disaster occurred on the 5th October 1571
when a high tide accompanied by a violent storm destroyed two churches. One at
Sutton and the other at Chapel St Leonards. Parts of those villages were also
destroyed along with the loss of much valuable farm land to the relentless North
Sea.
|